FT View:

The 2016 election, more than any in recent memory, is a test for the legitimacy of the US political system, with profound implications for the liberal world order. Mrs Clinton carries enough baggage to fill a Boeing 747. She is not trusted by the majority of voters.

But she is manifestly more competent than Mr Trump whose braggadocio, divisiveness and meanness are on daily display. Despite her faults, Mrs Clinton is eminently qualified to be the first woman elected to the White House. She has the Financial Times’ endorsement.

Editorials:

What Clinton lacks in charisma she makes up for as a policy wonk. This should make her a better president than a candidate.

She has plans to help seniors and the impoverished with medical expenses; students with debt; parents with child care costs; small business with taxes; and our planet with progressive environmental policies. She strives to craft a humane version of immigration reform and reasonable gun safety laws. She may be too traditional a policymaker during a time when the people of American are starving for change, but she has demonstrated an ability to work with rivals to mend breaches.

Editorials:

If Clinton had been facing a formidable Republican opponent – Ohio Gov. John Kasich, say – this would have been an entirely different general election. But she’s facing Trump. And that alone should make the decision as easy as pie.

On Election Day, the informed, practical, experienced, highly intelligent and reliable Clinton will be on the ballot against a huckster, an entertainer whose act, so distressing from its opening in June of last year, has been increasingly difficult to endure over the past 16 months.

What would be best for Clinton – and the nation – is a convincing win in which she handily dispatches Trump.

Ryan Lizza makes a good point:

Think of the decision from Comey’s perspective. He could either disclose the new development now and risk being accused of influencing the election, or he could keep quiet; then, when the news of Abedin’s laptop inevitably leaked, he could be accused of caving to Lynch and her staff and keeping the information from voters. If the news leaked after the election and after Hillary Clinton was President, Republicans would turn the non-disclosure into a monumental scandal and allege that Comey played a role in a Lynch-instigated cover-up. If Clinton were President, the ensuing scandal would taint her victory, with Republicans arguing that voters were kept in the dark about a major development in one of the central issues of the campaign.

Let’s hope this will be the case. Lizza concludes:

It’s far better for the public to have this information now than after the election. Perhaps it’s possible that this revelation will swing the election to Trump. But it seems highly unlikely. Clinton is still favored to win, and, if she does, Comey will have done her a favor.

Editorials:

This is the first time our editorial board has endorsed a Democratic presidential nominee since Jimmy Carter in 1976. Through the years, we evaluated nominees based on our support for reducing the national debt, strengthening national security and other conservative values. Those values compel us to endorse Mrs. Clinton this year.

Jeffrey Toobin:

Comey says that he didn’t “want to create a misleading impression,” but that’s precisely what he did. He had to know that his vague letter to Congress virtually demanded elaboration from “senior government officials,” who would apply their own gloss, in the form of leaks. The responsibility for the confusion sown by these leaks, if not for the leaks themselves, belongs only to Comey. If the outcome of the Presidential election turns on Comey’s action, that’s his burden, and the nation’s, too.

Comey had made a terrible decision to cover himself. He should resign.

I was not planning on voting early, but F.B.I. Director James Comey motivated me to get to poll. Yes, I cast my vote for Hillary regardless of the announcement yesterday. The email scandal is not going change my mind. Nothing in those emails could be more horrifying than witnessing Trump destroying this great country.

The stake in this election is dangerously high. If you are legible to vote, get to the pole early if you can. Don’t wait until November 8 to cast your ballot. It’s definitely a privilege to be able to vote in this country. Don’t take it for granted.

Now that I had done my duty as a U.S. citizen, I am just going to lie back and relax until November 8 for a historic moment.

To avoid sexism in writing, the grammar instructor advised us against using an exclusive gendered pronoun. She corrected me when I refer to an employee as a he instead of a he or she, which is too cumbersome. She pointed out that he would be correct if the company employed only male employees. Then I read this sentence in The New Yorker from Rebecca Mead:

The next President, whoever she is, will in any case have a smaller role to play in determining education policy than did her predecessor: the bipartisan Every Child Succeeds Act, which reduces the role of federal government in decisions related to schools, and grants larger autonomy to the states, was signed into law by President Obama almost a year ago.

Is Mead endorsing Hillary?

Editorial Board:

[W]e do not endorse Hillary Clinton’s exemplary leadership during her 30 years in the public eye. We do not support her impressive commitment to serving and improving this country—a commitment to which she has dedicated her entire professional career. Because of unambiguous tax law, we do not encourage you to support the most qualified presidential candidate in modern American history, nor do we encourage all citizens to shatter the glass ceiling once and for all by electing Secretary Clinton on November 8.

Right on!

David Leonhardt addresses the Republicans:

The best path is the hardest one. Only an unambiguous rejection of Trump will banish Trumpism for 2020 and beyond. Only a lopsided loss, with millions of Republicans so repelled by him that they vote for someone they never imagined they would, sends the message that bigotry, lying and authoritarianism violate Republican values — your values.